Geospatial and Machine Learning Techniques for Landslide Risk Mapping in Sikkim, India
International Journal of Recent Engineering Science (IJRES) | |
|
© 2024 by IJRES Journal | ||
Volume-11 Issue-6 |
||
Year of Publication : 2024 | ||
Authors : Saurabh Kumar Anuragi, D. Kishan |
||
DOI : 10.14445/23497157/IJRES-V11I6P116 |
How to Cite?
Saurabh Kumar Anuragi, D. Kishan, "Geospatial and Machine Learning Techniques for Landslide Risk Mapping in Sikkim, India," International Journal of Recent Engineering Science, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 187-197, 2024. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23497157/IJRES-V11I6P116
Abstract
Identifying landslides and producing landslide susceptibility maps are essential components in supporting planners, local administrators, and decision-makers in effective disaster management strategies. The accuracy of these susceptibility maps plays a pivotal role in mitigating potential loss of life and property. Effective models for landslide susceptibility mapping require the integration of multiple factors that characterize both terrain features and meteorological conditions. Numerous algorithms have been developed and implemented in the literature to enhance the accuracy of these maps. This study employs a hybrid approach combining four machine learning techniques: Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Classifier (SVC), and CatBoost, supplemented by a grid search to determine optimal hyperparameter settings. This methodological framework aims to achieve precise and reliable predictions for generating landslide susceptibility maps for Sikkim, India. In this study, eleven conditioning factors were considered, including aspect, slope, Land Use and Land Cover (LULC), elevation, distance to roads, distance to streams, the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), plan curvature, soil type, rainfall, and seismic activity. The performance of the models was assessed using several metrics, including training score, testing score, kappa, sensitivity, specificity, and Area Under the Curve (AUC). The results indicated that the random forest model outperformed the other models, achieving kappa and AUC values of 0.519 and 0.756, respectively, in developing susceptibility maps. Consequently, the random forest model emerges as the most reliable and effective tool for landslide susceptibility mapping within this study, making it an optimal choice for such predictive analyses.
Keywords
Landslide susceptibility mapping, Machine learning, CatBoost, Hybrid techniques, Random Forest.
Reference
[1] Oktay Ergünay, “Turkey's Disaster Profile,” TMMOB Disaster Symposium, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 1-14, 2007.
[Google Scholar]
[2] Temel Bayrak, and Mustafa Ulukavak, “Trabzon Landslides,” Electronic Magazine of Mapping Technologies, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 20-30, 2009.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] Wei Chen, et al., “Spatial Prediction of Landslides Using Hybrid Integration of Artificial Intelligence Algorithms with Fre quency Ratio and Index of Entropy in Nanzheng County, China,” Applied Sciences, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1-21, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] Md Fariduddin Rafique, and Varun Joshi, “Information Value Model Based Mapping of Updated Spatial and Temporal Landslide Susceptibility: A Case Study from East Sikkim District, India’s North-eastern Himalayas,” Environmental and Earth Sciences, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[5] Prakash Biswakarma et al., “Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in east Sikkim Region of Sikkim Himalaya using High Resolution Remote Sensing Data and GIS Techniques,” Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 143-153, 2020.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] Harjeet Kaur et al., “Evaluation of Landslide Susceptibility in A Hill City of Sikkim Himalaya with The Perspective of Hybrid Modelling Techniques,” Annals of GIS, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 113-132, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] Jagabandhu Roy et al., “A Novel Ensemble Approach for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping (LSM) in Darjeeling and Kalimpong Districts, West Bengal, India,” Remote Sensing, vol. 11, no. 23, pp. 1-28, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] Alireza Arabameri et al., “GIS-Based Gully Erosion Susceptibility Mapping: A Comparison Among Three Data-Driven Models and AHP Knowledge-Based Technique,” Environmental Earth Sciences, vol. 77, pp. 1-22, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] Litesh Bopche and Priti P. Rege “Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: An Integrated Approach Using Geographic Information Value, Remote Sensing, and Weight of Evidence Method,” Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 2935-2947, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] Rui-Xuan Tang et al., “Comparison of Logistic Regression, Information Value, and Comprehensive Evaluating Model for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 1-25, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] Federico Cervi et al., “Comparing Predictive Capability of Statistical and Deterministic Methods for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study in The Northern Apennines (Reggio Emilia Province, Italy),” Landslides, vol. 7, pp. 433-444, 2010.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] Taskin Kavzoglu, and Alihan Teke, “Predictive Performances of Ensemble Machine Learning Algorithms in Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and Natural Gradient Boosting (NGBoost),” Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 7367-7385, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] Gizem Karakas, Sultan Kocaman, and Candan Gokceoglu, “Comprehensive Performance Assessment of Landslide Susceptibility Mapping with MLP and Random Forest: A Case Study After Elazig Earthquake (24 Jan 2020, Mw 6.8), Turkey,” Environmental Earth Sciences, vol. 81, no. 5, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] Ismail Colkesen, Emrehan Kutlug Sahin, and Taskin Kavzoglu, “Susceptibility Mapping of Shallow Landslides Using Kernel-Based Gaussian Process, Support Vector Machines and Logistic Regression,” Journal of African Earth Sciences, vol. 118, pp. 53-64, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[15] Aril Aditian, Tetsuya Kubota, and Yoshinori Shinohara, “Comparison of GIS-based Landslide Susceptibility Models Using Frequency Ratio, Logistic Regression, and Artificial Neural Network in a Tertiary Region of Ambon, Indonesia,” Geomorphology, vol. 318, pp. 101-111, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[16] Yanli Wu, et al., “Application of Alternating Decision Tree with AdaBoost and Bagging Ensembles for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping,” Catena, vol. 187, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[17] Zakaria Matougui, Lynda Djerbal, and Ramdane Bahar, “A Comparative Study of Heterogeneous and Homogeneous Ensemble Approaches for Landslide Susceptibility Assessment in The Djebahia Region, Algeria,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 31, no. 28, pp. 40554-40580, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[18] Taorui Zeng et al., “Ensemble Learning Framework for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: Different Basic Classifier and Ensemble Strategy,” Geoscience Frontiers, vol. 14, no. 6, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[19] Erdinc Yücesoy, Erol Egrioglu, and Eren Bas, “A New Intuitionistic Fuzzy Time Series Method Based on The Bagging of Decision Trees and Principal Component Analysis,” Granular Computing, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 1925-1935, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[20] Suyue Han et al., “A New Approach for Landslide Susceptibility Assessments Based on KDE-MDBN: A Case Study from Mountainous Regions Impacted by The Wenchuan Earthquake, China,” Environmental Modelling and Software, vol. 167, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[21] Haijia Wen et al., “A Hybrid Machine Learning Model for Landslide-Oriented Risk Assessment of Long-Distance Pipelines,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 342, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]