The Accessibility for the Difables at City Park in Surakarta

The Accessibility for the Difables at City Park in Surakarta

  IJRES-book-cover  International Journal of Recent Engineering Science (IJRES)          
  
© 2017 by IJRES Journal
Volume-4 Issue-6
Year of Publication : 2017
Authors : Arozi Setiawan, Dwi Aries Himawanto
DOI : 10.14445/23497157/IJRES-V4I6P103

How to Cite?

Arozi Setiawan, Dwi Aries Himawanto, " The Accessibility for the Difables at City Park in Surakarta," International Journal of Recent Engineering Science, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 11-16, 2017. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23497157/IJRES-V4I6P103

Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the availability and accessibility level of city park facility in Surakarta. The objects of this study was three city parks in Surakarta. They are Banjarsari park, Balekambangpark, Cerdas park. There are sevenfasicities which is observed. They are parking areas, guiding block, toilets, stairs, RAM, signs, and sink. The research method that used is evaluation approaches, that assess the extent of an object has been achieved in accordance with the standards of Regulation of the Minister of Public Works of the Republic of Indonesia Number 30 Year 2006 on Technical Guidelines amenities and accessibility In the Building and Environment. The data were analyzed by using statistical descriptions by comparing field data with the standard provisions. The results showed that there is no accessible facility for difable, but one facility has reached the 57% accessbility level for stairs. Citypark is one of public facilities for people including difable. Therefore, public facilities in city park need to be upgraded so it can be useful for everyone, especially difable.

Keywords
Accessibility, City Park, Difable

Reference
[1] Undang-UndangDasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945
[2] Tobroni, F. (2015). URGENSI PROSES PERADILAN AFIRMATIf BAGI PEREMPUAN DIFABEL KORBAN PERKOSAAN. JurnalYudisial, 8(3), 339-359.
[3] DepartemenPendidikanNasional (2012). KamusBesar Bahasa Indonesia (Cetakanke IV EdisiKeempat). Jakarta: Gramedia.
[4] Undang-undang No 8 Tahun 2016 tentangPenyandangDisabilitas
[5] Morris, J. M., Dumble, P. L., &Wigan, M. R. (1978). Accessibility indicators for transport planning. Transportation Research Part A: General, 13(2), 91-109
[6] Thohari, S. (2017). PandanganDisabilitasdanAksesibilitasFasilitasPublikbagiPe nyandangDisabilitas di Kota Malang. INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF DISABILITY STUDIES (IJDS), 1(1).
[7] Ostergaard, P. (2002) Universal Designing in John Cristophersen (Ed.) Universal Design: 17 Ways of Thinking and Teaching. Oslo: Husbankenversi e-book. Diunduhdarihttps://nedlasting.husbanken.nopada 11 Oktober 2017
[8] PeraturanMenteriPekerjaanUmumNomor 30/PRT/M/2006 PedomanTeknisFasilitasdanAksesibilitaspadaBangunanGed ungdanLingkungan.
[9] Lidwell, W., Holden, K., & Butler, J. (2010). Universal principles of design, revised and updated: 125 ways to enhance usability, influence perception, increase appeal, make better design decisions, and teach through design. Rockport Pub
[10] Kadir, S. A., Jamaludin, M., & Rahim, A. A. (2012). Building Managers’ Perception in Regards to Accessibility and Universal Design Implementation in Public Buildings: Putrajaya case studies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 35, 129-136.
[11] Follette, M. (2002). Universal Designing in John Cristophersen (Ed.) Universal Design: 17 Ways of Thinking and Teaching. Oslo: Husbankenversi e-book. Diunduhdarihttps://nedlasting.husbanken.nopada 11 Oktober 2017
[12] The City of Calgary (2010). Universal Design Handbook: Accesible& Inclusive Environments versi e-book. Diunduhdari calgary.ca/cspada 11 Oktober 2017
[13] de Souza, S. C., & de Oliveira Post, A. P. D. (2016). Universal Design: an urgent need. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216, 338-344.
[14] Dewi, N. K., Wahyuwibowo, A. K., &Farkhan, A. (2017). Aplikasi Prinsip Desain Universal Pada Sekolah Inklusi Terpadu di Surakarta. ARSITEKTURA, 15 (1), 284 - 290.
[15] Wahono, A. E. (2017). Perancangan Interior Hotel bagiKaumDifabeldenganPrinsipDesain Universal danInklusif di Surabaya. Intra, 5(2), 890-898.
[16] Maftuhin, A. (2017). Mendifinisikan Kota Inklusif: Asal – Usul, Teori, danIndikator. TATALOKA, 19(2), 93-103.
[17] Iswara, R., Astuti, W., &Putri, R. A. (2017). KesesuaianFungsi Taman Kota dalamMendukungKonsep Kota LayakHuni di Surakarta. ARSITEKTURA, 15(1), 115- 123.
[18] Undang – Undang No 26 Tahun 2007 tentangPenataanRuang
[19] PeraturanMenteriPekerjaanUmumNomor 5/PRT/M/2008 PedomanPenyediaandanPemanfaatanRuang Terbuka Hijau Di KawasanPerkotaan
[20] Talay, L., Akpinar, N., &Belkayali, N. (2010). Barriers to playground use for children with disabilities: A case from Ankara, Turkey. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 5(9), 848-855
[21] Najmeddin, S., &Ahmadi, M. Tailoring Coastal Park for the Use of Veterans and People with Physical-Motion Disabilities (Case study: Noshahr Beach Park). European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences: Proceedings, 4(3 (s)), 2016, pp.646-656.
[22] Seto, B. A. (2013). AksesibilitasPenyandangDisabilitasDalamPelayananPublik BidangPendidikan Dan Ketenagakerjaan Di Kota Surakarta, versi pdf. Diunduhdari www.digilib.uns.ac.id pada 12 Oktober 2017
[23] Subarkah, M. A. Aksesbilitas Wisatawan Difabel Terhadap Obyek dan Daya Tarik Wisata Sebagai Ruang Publik Di Kota Surakarta (StudiKasusPadaAksesibilitasDifabel Taman SatwaTaruJurug, Taman Balekambang, Taman Sriwedari, PusatGrosir Solo danKeraton Surakarta Hadiningrat) (Doctoral dissertation, UniversitasSebelasMaret), 2017.
[24] Riduwan. (2010). MetodedanTeknikMenyusunTesis. Bandung: Alfabeta
[25] Santamouris, M. (2016). Editorial Preface. Energy, pollution and the degradation of the urban environment. Tema. Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 9(2), 135- 136.