International Journal of Recent
Engineering Science

Research Article | Open Access | Download PDF
Volume 13 | Issue 4 | Year 2026 | Article Id. IJRES-V13I4P104 | DOI : https://doi.org/10.14445/23497157/IJRES-V13I4P104

Importance of Analytical Hierarchy Process in Contractor Selection and Structural Audit


Snehal Pradeep Wakade, Manisha Jamgade

Received Revised Accepted Published
13 Jun 2026 21 Jul 2026 14 Aug 2026 31 Aug 2026

Citation :

Snehal Pradeep Wakade, Manisha Jamgade, "Importance of Analytical Hierarchy Process in Contractor Selection and Structural Audit," International Journal of Recent Engineering Science (IJRES), vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 34-38, 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23497157/IJRES-V13I4P104

Abstract

During the development and maintenance phases of a building, major decisions need to be taken to control its lifecycle. Not methodically inspecting old structures can lead to catastrophic failure, and picking a poor contractor can cause cost overruns and structural flaws. This study presents an integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) framework with the use of the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) for two important processes, which are the selection of the building contractor and the evaluation of the priorities of the structural audit. We created two different hierarchical evaluation models. The structural audit model considers building distress signals like carbonation depth, fracture widths & Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV) variation as priority, while contractor selection model balances the financial bids against qualitative technical & safety indicators. The pairwise comparison matrices obtained from the data of the sector specialists were verified using the Consistency Ratio (CR) limitations. The results indicated the Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) results (42.4%) determine the priorities of structural audits, and the most important element in the selection of contractors is the technical expertise (39.1%). This paradigm of dual-application provides engineers and stakeholders with a rigorous, transparent decision-support system for asset management and structural safety improvement.

Keywords

Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Contractor Selection, Structural Audit, Non-Destructive Testing (NDT), Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM).

References

[1] Abdul Kareem Abdul Jawwad, and Ibrahim AbuNaffa, “Applying Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) in Selecting Best Maintenance Strategies for Newly Established Chemical Fertilizers Plants,” Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 545-566, 2022.

[2] Murat Gunduz, Khalid Naji, and Khalid Al-Salahi, “Evaluation of Critical Success Factors (CSFs) in Selecting Building Contractors through Pareto and Analytical Hierarchy Process,” Journal of Engineering Research, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1-15, 2020.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[3] Solomon Belay et al., “AHP based Multi Criteria Decision Analysis of Success Factors to Enhance Decision Making in Infrastructure Construction Projects,” Cogent Engineering, vol. 9, no. 1, 2022.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[4] Changsaar Chai, Chia Kuang Lee, and Mervyn Hsin Jyi Wong, “Analytic Hierarchy Progress (AHP) for Construction Technologies Adoption in the Malaysian Construction Industry,” Sustainable Construction and Heritage Conservation in the Digital Age, pp. 113-144, 2026.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[5] Zhen-Song Chen et al., “Expertise-based Bid Evaluation for Construction-Contractor Selection with Generalized Comparative Linguistic ELECTRE III,” Automation in Construction, vol. 125, 2021. 
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[6] Daniel Jato-Espino et al., “A Review of Application of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods in Construction,” Automation in Construction, vo. 45, pp. 151-162, 2014.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[7] Mary Hardie, and Swapan Saha, “Builders' Perceptions of Lowest Cost Procurement and Its Impact on Quality,” The Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1-8, 2009.
[
CrossRef] [Publisher Link]

[8] Iman Nurjaman, and Rully Andika Listyantoko, “Analytic Hierarchy Process for Determination of Decision Making in the Selection of Contractors,” Jurnal Industry Xplore, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1-9, 2023.
[
Google Scholar]

[9] Reuben A. Okereke, Dennis Isaac Pepple, and Nneka Mercyjane Ihekweme, “Assessment of the Major Contractors’ Selection Criteria and Their Impacts in Civil Engineering Construction Projects,” ITEGAM- Journal of Engineering and Technology for Industrial Applications (ITEGAM-JETIA), vol. 8, no. 36, pp. 4-13, 2022.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]

[10] Alaa Salman, “Selection of Construction Bidders using the Analytical Hierarchy Process and Friedman Theory,” Frontiers in Built Environment, vol. 7, pp. 1-11, 2021.
[
CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]