Evaluating Latency and Packet Loss of Direct and Hotspot Internet Connections for Quality of Service and Network Selection
 |
International Journal of Recent Engineering Science (IJRES) |  |
| © 2025 by IJRES Journal | ||
| Volume-12 Issue-4 |
||
| Year of Publication : 2025 | ||
| Authors : Gbigbidje Favour Peter, Oghuvwu Blessing Edirin, Omolale Oluwaseun Victor, Obuseh Emmanuel Ewere, Jude Alele, Obayehagweme Ezekiel |
||
| DOI : 10.14445/23497157/IJRES-V12I4P104 |
How to Cite?
Gbigbidje Favour Peter, Oghuvwu Blessing Edirin, Omolale Oluwaseun Victor, Obuseh Emmanuel Ewere, Jude Alele, Obayehagweme Ezekiel, "Evaluating Latency and Packet Loss of Direct and Hotspot Internet Connections for Quality of Service and Network Selection," International Journal of Recent Engineering Science, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 34-49, 2025. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23497157/IJRES-V12I4P104
Abstract
This study evaluates latency and packet loss associated with direct and hotspot internet connections to support quality of service and network selection decisions. Latency and packet loss are critical performance metrics that directly affect user experience in real-life applications and overall network reliability. Using an experimental design, measurements are collected over fourteen consecutive days in Ughelli, Delta State, Nigeria, on four major mobile networks, MTN, Globalcom, 9mobile, and Airtel, at four different times daily (1:00 am, 7:00 am, 1:00 pm, and 7:00 pm). The data, analyzed through average statistical methods, reveal that MTN records the lowest average latency of 200.12 ms, followed by Globalcom (281.25 ms), 9mobile (286.18 ms), and Airtel (462.65 ms). Latency peaks during busy periods (1:00 pm and 7:00 pm) and is notably lower during off-peak times, particularly at 1:00 am. Packet loss results show MTN (1.42%) and Globalcom (2.21%) remain within the acceptable standard limit of 2.5%, while 9mobile (2.57%) slightly exceeds it, and Airtel (4.79%) shows higher packet loss. All networks exceed the recommended latency threshold of 60 ms for 4G LTE networks. Furthermore, hotspot connections consistently experience higher latency and packet loss compared to direct mobile connections. These findings highlight significant differences in performance across operators and connection types, emphasizing the need for users to consider these metrics when selecting networks for latency-sensitive tasks.
Keywords
Direct connection, Hotspot connection, Latency, Lte, Packet loss.
Reference
[1] F.M. Dahunsi, and A.A. Akinsabi, “Measuring Mobile Broadband Performance in Nigeria: 2G and 3G,” Nigerian Journal of Technology, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 422-436, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] Fabricio Carvalho de Gouveia, and Thomas Magedanz, “Quality of Service in Telecommunication Networks,” Telecommunication Systems and Technologies, vol. 2, pp. 1-8, 2009.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] A. Sheth et al., “Packet Loss Characterization in WiFi-Based Long Distance Networks,” IEEE INFOCOM 2007 - 26th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications, Anchorage, AK, USA, pp. 312-320, 2007.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] Daniel Aguayo et al., “Link-Level Measurements from an 802.11b Mesh Network,” Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures and Protocols for Computer Communication, pp. 121-132, 2004.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[5] Zhehui Zhang et al., “Analysis of Cellular Network Latency for Edge-Based Remote Rendering Streaming Applications,” ACM SIGCOMM Workshop, pp. 8-14, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] Toke Høiland-Jørgensen et al., “Measuring Latency Variation in the Internet,” Proceedings of the 12th International on Conference on emerging Networking EXperiments and Technologies, pp. 473-480, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] Dhwani R. Bhadra et al., “Packet Loss Probability in Wireless Networks: A Survey,” IEEE International Conference on Communication and Signal Processing, Melmaruvathur, India, pp. 1348-1354, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] Eric A. Brewer, “Technology Insights for Rural Connectivity,” Wireless Communication and Development: A Global Perspective, pp. 1-8, 2005.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] Verizon, What is 4G LTE and Why it Matters, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.verizon.com/about/news/what-4g-lte-and-why-it-matters
[10] Mark Allman, “Comments on Bufferbloat,” ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communications Review, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 30-37, 2013.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] Ivica Kostanic, Nenad Mijatovic, and Stephen D. Vest, “Measurement Based QoS Comparison of Cellular Communication Networks,” IEEE International Workshop Technical Committee on Communications Quality and Reliability, Naples, FL, USA, pp. 1-5, 2009.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] I. Weissberger, N. Mijatovic, and I. Kostanic, “Evaluating FTP QoS in a UMTS Network,” Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Wireless Networks, pp. 1-11, 2009.
[Google Scholar]
[13] Carlos Otero et al., “Characterization of User-Perceived Quality of Service (QoS) in Mobile Devices Using Network Pairwise Comparisons,” International Journal of Wireless & Mobile Networks, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 141-153, 2010.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] O. Shoewu, and F.O. Edeko, “Outgoing Call Quality Evaluation of GSM Network Services in Epe, Lagos State,” American Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 409-417, 2011.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[15] A. Saxena, and R.D. Yadav, “Impact of Mobile Technology on Libraries: A Descriptive Study,” International Journal of Digital Library Services, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1-58, 2013.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[16] B.C. Asiegbu et al., “Assessment of Factors Affecting Quality of Service of Cellular Mobile Network Operators in Nigeria for the Period 2010 to 2014,” International Journal of Engineering and Modern Technology, vol. 1, no. 8, pp. 27-37, 2015.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[17] M.A. Habibi et al., “Measurement and Analysis of Quality of Service of Mobile Networks in Afghanistan – End User Perspective,” AGRIS Online Papers in Economics and Informatics, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 73-84, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[18] Arinze SN, Alor MO, and Okafor PU, “Determination of Quality of Service (QOS) in Mobile Network,” Scholars Journal of Engineering and Technology, vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 288-292, 2018.
[Publisher Link]
[19] Segun I. Popoola et al., “Data on the Key Performance Indicators for Quality of Service of GSM Networks in Nigeria,” Data in Brief, vol. 16, pp. 914-928, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[20] Obe Olumide Olayinka, Sangodoyin Oluranti Olukemi, and Otti Chukwuemeka, “Assessment of Quality of Service of Mobile Network Operators in Akure,” International Journal of Business Administration, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 118-131, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[21] Samson Dauda Yusuf, Sule Idris Isa, and Barnabas John Kwaha, “Analysis of 4G/LTE Network Performance in North-Central Nigeria: A Comprehensive Drive Test Approach,” Journal of Engineering Research and Reports, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 105-122, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[22] Jibrin Abdullahi, and Aminu Alhaji Abdulhamid, “Evaluating 4G network performance in North-Central Nigeria: A Drive Test-Based Assessment of Key Performance Indicators,” International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 305-323, 2025.
[CrossRef] [Publisher Link]
[23] F.M. Dahunsi, and A.A. Akinsabi, “Measuring Mobile Broadband Performance in Nigeria: 2G and 3G,” Nigerian Journal of Technology, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 422-436, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[24] Vincent Umoh et al., “Mobile Broadband Adoption, Performance Measurements and Methodology: A Review,” Electronics, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 1-25, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]