A Framework for the Foundation of the Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence

A Framework for the Foundation of the Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence

  IJRES-book-cover  International Journal of Recent Engineering Science (IJRES)          
  
© 2024 by IJRES Journal
Volume-11 Issue-4
Year of Publication : 2024
Authors : Emily Barnes, James Hutson
DOI : 10.14445/23497157/IJRES-V11I4P114

How to Cite?

Emily Barnes, James Hutson, "A Framework for the Foundation of the Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence," International Journal of Recent Engineering Science, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 113-126, 2024. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23497157/IJRES-V11I4P114

Abstract
In recent years, the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) technology has sparked profound questions about the nature of machine intelligence and the possibility of AI consciousness. As AI systems become increasingly sophisticated, examining their philosophical foundations has become imperative. This article investigates the intricate relationship between AI and existential thought, aiming to establish a comprehensive framework for understanding AI's philosophical underpinnings. The historical development of AI, from symbolic AI to contemporary machine learning paradigms, highlights the increasing complexity and sophistication of AI systems, prompting significant philosophical debates about machine consciousness. Theoretical models such as the Independent Core Observer Model (ICOM), Integrated Information Theory (IIT), and Global Neuronal Workspace Theory (GNWT) provide frameworks for understanding potential mechanisms of AI consciousness. Recent methods in AI consciousness research, such as integrating consciousness indicators from neuroscientific theories and developing AI systems that exhibit metathinking, creativity, and empathy, represent significant advancements over traditional models. This article also explores ethical considerations, societal impacts, and the necessity for robust regulatory frameworks in developing conscious AI. Addressing these aspects is crucial for ensuring that AI integration into society is ethically sound and beneficial. By synthesizing diverse methodologies and addressing key challenges, this article aims to advance the understanding of AI consciousness and pave the way for future innovations and applications in this transformative field.

Keywords
Artificial Intelligence, Philosophy, AI consciousness, Ethical considerations, Theoretical models.

Reference
[1] Mario Günther, and Atoosa Kasirzadeh, “Algorithmic and Human Decision Making: For a Double Standard of Transparency,” AI & Society: Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Communication, vol. 37, pp. 375-381, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] Lisa Miracchi, “A Competence Framework for Artificial Intelligence Research,” Philosophical Psychology, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 588-633, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] Alfred Zimmermann, Rainer Schmidt, and Kurt Sandkuhl, “Strategic Challenges for Platform-Based Intelligent Assistants,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 176, pp. 966-975, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] Roman Lukyanenko, Wolfgang Maass, and Veda C. Storey, “Trust in Artificial Intelligence: From a Foundational Trust Framework to Emerging Research Opportunities,” Electronic Markets, vol. 32, pp.1993-2020, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[5] Luciano Floridi et al., How to Design AI for Social Good: Seven Essential Factors, Ethics, Governance, and Policies in Artificial Intelligence, Springer, Cham, pp. 125-151, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] Andrej Dameski, Avoiding Corporate Armageddon: The Need for a Comprehensive Ethical Framework for AI and Automation in Business, Responsible Business in a Changing World: New Management Approaches for Sustainable Development, Springer, Cham, pp. 353-367, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] Ransome Bawack, “How Perceived Intelligence Affects Consumer Adoption of AI-Based Voice Assistants: An Affordance Perspective,” Proceedings of the Twenty-fifth Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, Dubai, UAE, pp. 1-14, 2021.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] Patricia Gomes Rêgo de Almeida, Carlos Denner dos Santos, and Josivania Silva Farias, “Artificial Intelligence Regulation: A Framework for Governance,” Ethics and Information Technology, vol. 23, pp.505-525, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] Yue Yang et al., “Holodeck: Language Guided Generation of 3D Embodied AI Environments,” Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 16227-16237, 2024.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] S. Krishnaveni et al., “CyberDefender: An Integrated Intelligent Defense Framework for Digital-Twin-Based Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems,” Cluster Computing, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] Francesca Trevisan et al., “Deconstructing Controversies to Design a Trustworthy AI Future,” Ethics and Information Technology, vol. 26, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] Saphalya Peta, “Journey of Artificial Intelligence Frontier: A Comprehensive Overview,” Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology: D Neural & Artificial Intelligence, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 1-36, 2023.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] Rafael B. Audibert et al., “On the Evolution of A.I. and Machine Learning: Towards a Meta-Level Measuring and Understanding Impact, Influence, and Leadership at Premier A.I. Conferences,” Journal of Applied Logics - IfCoLog Journal, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 693- 817, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] Naseem Zaidi, Brijendra Singh, and Sunil Yadav, “The Evolution of Machine Learning Algorithms: A Comprehensive Historical Review,” International Journal of Applied Research, vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 49-55, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Publisher Link]
[15] Stacey Tobin et al., “A Brief Historical Overview of Artificial Intelligence Research,” Information Services and Use, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 291-296, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[16] Ameet Joshi, Artificial Intelligence and Human Evolution: Contextualizing AI in Human History, Apress, pp. 1-248, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[17] Tankiso Moloi, and Tshilidzi Marwala, A High-Level Overview of Artificial Intelligence: Historical Overview and Emerging Developments, Artificial Intelligence and the Changing Nature of Corporations: How Technologies Shape Strategy and Operations, Springer, Cham, pp. 11-21, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[18] Fatima Hameed Khan, Muhammad Adeel Pasha, and Shahid Masud, “Advancements in Microprocessor Architecture for Ubiquitous AI—An Overview on History, Evolution, and Upcoming Challenges in AI Implementation,” Micromachines, vol. 12, no. 6, pp.1-22, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[19] Walter Veit, “Complexity and the Evolution of Consciousness,” Biological Theory, vol. 18, pp.175-190, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[20] Ralf Mrowka, “An Artificial Intelligence Algorithm that May Blow Your Mind,” Acta Physiologica, vol. 237, no. 4, pp. 1-3, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[21] Eva Jablonka, and Simona Ginsburg, “Learning and the Evolution of Conscious Agents,” Biosemiotics, vol. 15, pp. 401–437, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[22] Nicholas J.M. Popiel et al., “The Emergence of Integrated Information, Complexity, and ‘Consciousness’ at Criticality,” Entropy, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 1-12, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[23] Bill Thompson et al., “Complex Cognitive Algorithms Preserved by Selective Social Learning in Experimental Populations,” Science, vol. 376, no. 6588, pp. 95-98, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[24] Thomas Rabeyron, and Alain Finkel, “Consciousness, Free Energy and Cognitive Algorithms,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 11, pp. 1- 5, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[25] Lenore Blum, and Manuel Blum, “A Theory of Consciousness from a Theoretical Computer Science Perspective: Insights from the Conscious Turing Machine,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 119, no. 21, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[26] Leigh Sheneman, Jory Schossau, and Arend Hintze, “The Evolution of Neuroplasticity and the Effect on Integrated Information,” Entropy, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 1-15, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[27] Patrick Butlin et al., “Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Science of Consciousness,” arXiv preprint, pp. 1-88, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[28] Peter R. Lewis, and Ştefan Sarkadi, “Reflective Artificial Intelligence,” Minds and Machines, vol. 34, pp.1-30, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[29] Dylan Ludwig, “The Functional Contributions of Consciousness,” Consciousness and Cognition, vol. 104, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[30] Anil K. Seth, “The Real Problem(s) with Panpsychism,” Journal of Consciousness Studies, vol. 28, no. 9-10, pp. 52-64, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[31] Sepehrdad Rahimian, “The Myth of When and Where: How False Assumptions Still Haunt Theories of Consciousness, Consciousness and Cognition, vol. 97, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[32] Philip Goff, “How Exactly Does Panpsychism Help Explain Consciousness?,” Journal of Consciousness Studies, vol. 31, no. 3-4, pp. 56-82, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[33] Robert Lawrence Kuhn, “A Landscape of Consciousness: Toward a Taxonomy of Explanations and Implications,” Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, vol. 190, pp. 28-169, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[34] Christof Koch, “Reflections of a Natural Scientist on Panpsychism,” Journal of Consciousness Studies, vol. 28, no. 9-10, pp.65-85, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[35] Anil K. Seth, and Tim Bayne, “Theories of Consciousness,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 23, pp. 439–452, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[36] Adam Safron, “An Integrated World Modeling Theory (IWMT) of Consciousness: Combining Integrated Information and Global Neuronal Workspace Theories with the Free Energy Principle and Active Inference Framework; Toward Solving the Hard Problem and Characterizing Agentic Causation,” Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 3, pp. 1-29, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[37] Michele Farisco, and Jean-Pierre Changeux, “About the Compatibility Between the Perturbational Complexity Index and the Global Neuronal Workspace Theory of Consciousness,” Neuroscience of Consciousness, vol. 2023, no. 1, pp. 1-8, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[38] Adrien Doerig et al., “The Unfolding Argument: Why IIT and Other Causal Structure Theories Cannot Explain Consciousness,” Consciousness and Cognition, vol. 72, pp. 49-59, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[39] Philip Woodward, “Consciousness and Rationality: The Lesson from Artificial Intelligence,” Journal of Consciousness Studies, vol. 29, no. 5-6, pp.150-175, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[40] Hadi Esmaeilzadeh, and Reza Vaezi, “Conscious Empathic AI in Service,” Journal of Services Research, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 549-564, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[41] Arlindo L. Oliveira, “A Blueprint for Conscious Machines,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 119, no. 23, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[42] Andrew Oberg, “Souls and Selves: Querying an AI Self with a View to Human Selves and Consciousness,” Religions, vol. 14, no.1, pp. 1-16, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[43] Joseph LeDoux et al., “Consciousness Beyond the Human Case,” Current Biology, vol. 33, no. 16, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[44] Bruno Forti, “The Hidden Structure of Consciousness,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 15, pp. 1-14, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[45] Christopher W. Tyler, “The Interstitial Pathways as the Substrate of Consciousness: A New Synthesis,” Entropy, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 1- 16, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[46] Andrea I. Luppi et al., “Distributed Harmonic Patterns of Structure-Function Dependence Orchestrate Human Consciousness,” Communications Biology, vol. 6, pp. 1-19, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[47] Robert Prentner, “Consciousness and Topologically Structured Phenomenal Spaces,” Consciousness and Cognition, vol. 70, pp. 25-38, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[48] Marius Usher, “Refuting the Unfolding Argument on the Irrelevance of Causal Structure to Consciousness,” Consciousness and Cognition, vol. 95, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[49] Mindaugas Kiškis, “Legal Framework for the Coexistence of Humans and Conscious AI,” Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 6, pp.1-9, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[50] Riccardo Manzotti, and Antonio Chella, “Good Old-Fashioned Artificial Consciousness and the Intermediate Level Fallacy,” Frontiers in Robotics and AI, vol. 5, pp. 1-10, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[51] Michael S. A. Graziano, “A Conceptual Framework for Consciousness,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 119, no. 18, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[52] Mohammad Nadji-Tehrani, and Ali Eslami, “A Brain-Inspired Framework for Evolutionary Artificial General Intelligence,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 31, no. 12, pp. 5257-5271, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[53] Matthias Michel et al., “Opportunities and Challenges for a Maturing Science of Consciousness,” Nature Human Behaviour, vol. 3, pp. 104–107, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[54] Antonino Raffone, “Grand Challenges in Consciousness Research Across Perception, Cognition, Self, and Emotion,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 12, pp.1-7, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[55] Tim Bayne et al., “Tests for Consciousness in Humans and Beyond,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 454-466, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[56] Tin Yan Alvin Liu, and Neil M. Bressler, “Controversies in Artificial Intelligence,” Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 324-328, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[57] Lucia Melloni et al., “Making the Hard Problem of Consciousness Easier,” Science, vol. 374, no. 6545, pp. 911-912, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[58] Ragnar Fjelland, “Why General Artificial Intelligence Will Not Be Realized,” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, vol. 7, pp. 1-9, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[59] Brian Patrick Green, “Ethical Reflections on Artificial Intelligence,” Scientia et Fides, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 9-31, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[60] Antonio Chella, “Artificial Consciousness: The Missing Ingredient for Ethical AI?,” Frontiers in Robotics and AI, vol. 10, pp. 1-5, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[61] Stuart McLennan et al., “Embedded Ethics: A Proposal for Integrating Ethics into the Development of Medical AI,” BMC Medical Ethics, vol. 23, pp.1-10, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[62] Jaana Leikas, Raija Koivisto, and Nadezhda Gotcheva, “Ethical Framework for Designing Autonomous Intelligent Systems,” Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, vol. 5, no. 1, pp.1-12, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[63] Brent Mittelstadt, “Principles Alone Cannot Guarantee Ethical AI,” Nature Machine Intelligence, vol. 1, pp. 501–507, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]