Implementation of Online Payment as a Transaction Solution in the Digital Era: A Comparative Study between QRIS, GOPAY, and SHOPEEPAY
 |
International Journal of Recent Engineering Science (IJRES) |  |
| © 2024 by IJRES Journal | ||
| Volume-11 Issue-4 |
||
| Year of Publication : 2024 | ||
| Authors : Fajrillah, Iskandar Muda, Sugianto, Andri Soemitra, Suri Purnami |
||
| DOI : 10.14445/23497157/IJRES-V11I4P106 |
How to Cite?
Fajrillah, Iskandar Muda, Sugianto, Andri Soemitra, Suri Purnami, "Implementation of Online Payment as a Transaction Solution in the Digital Era: A Comparative Study between QRIS, GOPAY, and SHOPEEPAY," International Journal of Recent Engineering Science, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 41-45, 2024. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23497157/IJRES-V11I4P106
Abstract
Online payments have become an urgent necessity in the digital age, replacing slow and cumbersome traditional transaction methods. In Indonesia, the emergence of payment platforms such as QRIS, GoPay, and ShopeePay offers a more efficient solution, although there are differences in usage, efficiency, and convenience that influence consumer choice. This study aims to provide a comparative analysis between the three platforms based on the criteria of security, transaction speed, ease of use, cost, and user satisfaction level. The methods used include secondary data collection, in-depth interviews, and participatory observation. Interim results show that QRIS excels in terms of security and lower transaction fees, while GoPay and ShopeePay are preferred for online transactions due to the additional features they offer. The highest level of user satisfaction is achieved by QRIS, followed by GoPay and ShopeePay. This research is expected to make a significant contribution to service providers in improving the quality of their platforms and to consumers in choosing the payment method that best suits their needs.
Keywords
Online payment, QRIS, GoPay, ShopeePay, Security, Transaction speed, Ease of use, Transaction fees, User satisfaction.
Reference
[1] Selfira et al., “Future Electronics Payment System Model,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series: 2 nd International Conference on Mechanical, Electronics, Computer, and Industrial Technology, Medan, North Sumatera, Indonesia, vol. 1230, no. 1, pp. 1-7, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] Tri Nanda Aulia, Edy Suryadi, and Heni Safitri, “The Influence of E-Wallet Use and Financial Literacy on Impulsive Buying Behavior,” Owner: Riset Dan Jurnal Akuntansi, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 2010-2020, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] Fred D. Davis, “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319-340, 1989.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] Edi Wijayanto et al., “The Influence of TAM Variables and Financial Literacy on QRIS Payment Decisions with Interest as an Intervening Variable (Study on Semarang State Polytechnic Students),” International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 6203-6209, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[5] Khoirul Fatah, “The Influence of Financial Literacy, Subjective Norms, and Perceived Behavioral Control on E-Wallet Use Post Covid 19,” Proceedings of the Scientific Conference on Accounting, vol. 10, 2023.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] Diah Fitri Harseno, and Didi Achjari, ‘Analysis of Factors Influencing E-Wallet Usage in Indonesia,” ABIS: Accounting and Business Information Systems Journal, vol. 9, no. 4, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] Helena Hervilia, Dayan Singasatia, and M. Agus Sunandar, “Analysis of Factors Influencing Technology Acceptance on Shopee Application Users Using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM),” INSOLOGI: Jurnal Sains Dan Teknologi, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 401- 410, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] Ali Mujahidin, ‘The Influence of Fintech E-Wallet on Consumptive Behavior in the Millennial Generation,” Inovbiz: Jurnal Inovasi Bisnis, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 143-150, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] Khairina Natsir et al., “Using Qris as a Digital Payment Tool to Increase MSME Productivity,” Jurnal Serina Abdimas, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 1154-1163, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] Hidayati Nasrah Nurhayati, and Iskandar Muda, “The General Ledger and Reporting Systems Cycle: Traditional vs Digital Accounting Information Systems Era in Pharmacy Issuers and Implementation of Internal Control Procedures that Enable Cost Savings in Dealing with Threats in the Cycle,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results, pp. 3558-3565, 2022.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] Ganlin Pu et al., “Asymmetric Impact of Natural Resources, Fintech, and Digital Banking on Climate Change and Environmental Sustainability in BRICS Countries,” Resources Policy, vol. 91, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] Everett M. Rogers, Arvind Singhal, and Margaret M. Quinlan, Diffusion of Innovations, An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research, Routledge, 3 rd ed, pp. 415-433, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] LucVinet, and Alexei Zhedanov, “A ‘Missing’ Family of Classical Orthogonal Polynomials,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, vol. 44, no. 8, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] Edi Wijayanto et al., “Application of the TAM Model and Financial Literacy on Interest in QRIS Digital Payments (Study on Semarang State Polytechnic Students),” Formosa Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 165-176, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]